Colorado Green Building Post

March 11, 2010

Profile of a One Stop Shop: Neighborhood Energy Connection

Filed under: Case Studies, Weatherizing and Retrofit — Tags: , — uswx @ 8:58 am

The Neighborhood Energy Connection (NEC) is a Saint Paul-based nonprofit organization that provides energy conservation information, services and programs to residents, businesses, and communities across Minnesota. Their stated mission is to reduce pollution, conserve resources, and improve quality of life by offering tools for energy-efficient living. Visit The NEC at http://www.thenec.org

Installed Efficiency Measures
The Neighborhood Energy Connection brings energy efficiency to Saint Paul homeowners with its Home Energy Squads, skilled crews that delivered installed measures in one low cost visit.

An NEC Home Energy Squad will visits  homes and recommends energy-saving measures. Home owners choose which improvements to make, and the Squad installs them on the spot. Home owners pay for the materials, but installation costs are free.

Choices include exterior door weather stripping, “smart” power strips, programmable thermostats, compact fluorescent lighting, water-saving shower heads and faucet aerators, and insulating water heater blankets.

Outreach and Education
Neighborhood organizations are teaming up to offer a residential energy efficiency program to Saint Paul residents. The first step is to attend a free workshop on saving energy and money in the home. Next, they schedule a home visit where the Home Energy Squad will install the energy-saving materials for only a $30 co-pay. Finally, we provide one year of personalized home energy reporting.

In order to qualify for the $30 co-pay for the home visit, residents must attend the free neighborhood home energy workshop.

March 18 (Thursday) from 6:00 to 8:00 PM
Event includes backyard composting workshop
March 20 (Saturday) from 10:00 AM to NOON  
March 25 (Thursday) from 6:30-8:00 PM
March 27 (Saturday) from 10:00 to 11:30 AM

February 24, 2010

Home Star Will Boost Jobs Says DC Think Tank

New Report from Center for American Progress Supports Home Star Initiative:

As the nation struggles to recover from one of the worst economic recessions in decades, unemployment has recently shown some marginal improvement, falling below 10 percent in January. But for workers in the construction and construction-related manufacturing sectors, there is little relief as jobless rates remain at near-Depression levels.

 

Total construction payroll employment has fallen by 2.1 million since 2006, with residential construction jobs down 38 percent and the jobless rate among experienced construction workers stuck at nearly 25 percent. Overall manufacturing employment has dropped 16 percent since the recession began in December 2007, but for manufacturing tied to construction the numbers are far worse: 30 percent in wood products, 22 percent in items such as window glass and fiberglass insulation, and 19 percent in fabricated metals and heating, ventilating, and air conditioning equipment. With credit still tight and the housing industry still in the doldrums, waiting for market forces to spur a recovery in construction could condemn hundreds of thousands of American families to years of continued economic struggle.

Fortunately, help is on the horizon. This week a bill establishing a HOME STAR program of consumer rebates for home energy efficiency retrofits will be introduced in the Senate thanks to the leadership of Sens. Mark Warner (D-VA) and Jeff Bingaman (D-NM), among others. Concerned members of Congress, with the Obama administration’s support, have crafted an incentive program to make millions of U.S. homes more energy efficient, swiftly create 168,000 jobs in construction and manufacturing among other industries, save homeowners nearly $10 billion over a decade through lower energy costs, and make a dent in global warming pollution.

 http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2010/02/home_star_back_to_work.html

February 16, 2010

Energy Efficiency as a Resource

Filed under: Weatherizing and Retrofit — Tags: , , — uswx @ 5:00 am

This 2003 report calculates the potential for energy efficiency in the natural gas sector for residential and commercial sectors for the natural gas market in the Pacific northwest. There is certainly more opportunity now as retrofit technology evolves, but this is an excellent case study in estimating the potenial for efficiency.

Ecotope, Inc. conducted a resource assessment to evaluate potential natural gas conservation measures that can be applied to the residential and commercial building stock serviced by Northwest Natural Gas (Northwest Natural). Conservation measures were developed from a variety of literature and from measures used in other natural gas conservation and efficiency programs throughout the country. The specific sources used for each measure are included in the individual workbooks. Measures were first reviewed for technical feasibility and appropriateness to the climate and local conditions.

Applicable measures were then analyzed to calculate the potential life cycle costs and benefits, and to determine the technical potential for savings. For this analysis, the technical potential is defined as the total savings that could be expected if every building that could benefit from a particular measure is actually treated.

To accomplish this, we performed the following tasks:

1. Compiled a list of potential measures for review, based on applicability to the Northwest Natural service territory.

2. Conducted a life cycle cost/benefit analysis for each measure.

3. Calculated estimates of the buildings that could benefit from each of the measures, and of the existing building stock that had already been treated through utility programs or market forces.

View the report: http://energytrust.org/library/reports/Resource_Assesment/GasRptFinal_SS103103.pdf

February 15, 2010

How the Recession and a Targeted Energy Efficiency Marketing Program Can Create a Greener Economy and Benefit Energy Utilities

Filed under: Energy Policy, Weatherizing and Retrofit — Tags: , , — uswx @ 5:00 am

By Gina Woodall and Joe Bates

While the origins of the current recession are well known (i.e., the collapse of the housing bubble, the Wall Street financial crises, the abrupt downturn in consumer spending), it has not been clear how the energy sector can benefit from it.  Recent research by Rockbridge Associates reveals how consumers’ desires to save money and help the environment during the downturn are creating opportunities for energy providers to meet their own business goals.  Couple the weak economy with a smart targeted marketing strategy for energy efficiency programs, and energy utilities can reduce overall consumption.

Unlike consumers, most energy providers are doing well financially, despite the recession.  However, they continue to find themselves under increasing pressure to reduce power consumption.  The fact is, the nation’s energy utilities are faced with a problem not caused by the recession.  In many regions of the country, energy companies are producing at full capacity and have no room to expand without incurring huge expenses.  Even where expansion plans are underway, it will take many years for additional capacity to come on line.  And “green” energy sources, such as wind farms have limitations as well (http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/27/business/27grid.html).

Thus, energy providers across the country need to figure out ways to reduce customers’ demand and extend the life of their current infrastructure.  Many energy efficiency programs are underway sponsored by cutting edge energy utilities, including demand response and rebate programs, but participation has been weak.  The weak economy and a targeted marketing strategy can increase the success of these programs.

How does the poor economy help energy utilities reduce demand?  If consumers are spending more time at home, due to spending less time out (i.e. not spending money in restaurants, malls, etc.), aren’t they using more energy?  A recent Rockbridge survey sheds light on this issue.

In order to save money, there are many ways consumers are retrenching; 43% are postponing the purchase of a high-end electronics product, 40% are delaying making home improvements, 33% are making their home more energy efficient to save on energy bills, and 32% are pushing back the purchase of a home appliance.  If you read the last sentence too fast, you might not have picked up on a startling fact.  Let’s reiterate the point.  One-third of households are actually spending money now on energy efficiency so they can save money later.  This finding has significant meaning for energy providers.

 

What energy investments are consumers making today?  Today, 81% of consumers use energy saving light bulbs.  This statistic alone is amazing due to the much higher cost of CFLs than incandescent bulbs at check out (typically 3 to 5 times more expensive).  More evidence of consumers spending now in order to save later is their purchases of energy efficient appliances, such as refrigerators (55%), water heaters (48%), and heating / cooling systems (41%).  It is clear consumers acknowledge a little pain in the wallet today will save money in the long run.

Is it all about the wallet or do people actually care about the environment?  Actually, it is both.  Two-thirds of these product owners say they purchased the products to save money AND to help the environment.  It is the best of both worlds making it easy to be green.

Can we expect this trend to continue?  Yes.  The above chart also illustrates this point.  Not only are consumers buying energy efficient products now, but more consumers are planning to make such purchases in the future.  This potential is greatest among the products least owned today, such as solar water heaters (39% either currently own or plan to buy in the future, mostly the latter), solar system for home heating (41%), and homes that are designed to be eco-friendly (43%).  Consumers will continue to act on their belief that what is good for the environment is also good for the wallet, and vice versa.

 

This sentiment is also evident among consumers when it comes to participating in energy efficiency programs, such as those initiated by local and state utilities.  For instance, 34% of consumers have replaced appliances through participating in a rebate program, 28% receive utility bills showing comparative energy use, and 27% receive their electricity from a provider using clean, renewable energy sources.  Similar to reasons for owning energy efficient products, consumers are participating in these programs to save money AND to help the environment.  This trend will also continue as the future potential participation rate for most of these programs is 50% or more of consumers, according to our research. 

What role can energy utilities play in spurring conservation behaviors?  A recent Rockbridge study shows the vast majority of energy use reduction will come from a small segment of customers.  Providers can maximize their energy reduction program results through a targeted marketing strategy.  We know from our research that consumers can be divided into six segments with different beliefs and behaviors in the green space (see below).

 

Based on this market segmentation, it is clear that a misguided energy conservation strategy will waste resources by reaching out to ALL consumers because many (a) respond to environmental issues by avoiding consumption and shunning technology, (b) are eking by a living and lack the time and resources for green services, or (c) are among the minority of the public that views the green movement as hype.  Thus, four types of consumers represent the greatest opportunity for a green strategy.

Green Tech Leaders - deeply committed consumers who also happen to be innovative.  They believe in technology, think green is “cool,” like doing business with green companies and believe that green products and services benefit their wallets.

The Opportunity: These consumers only represent 10% of the market, but tend to influence others, making them a prime target for expanding awareness and usage of your energy savings programs.  They are heavier than average users of social networking media, so it is important to give them informational resources to help your cause (e.g., an RSS Feed to a newsletter on energy programs).

Green Tech Followers - similar to the “leaders” in their commitment and innovative tendencies, the major difference being they do not readily influence others.  They think green is “fun.” 

The Opportunity: These consumers represent 18% of the market, and with the Leaders, are a logical target for green initiatives.

Tech-Savvy Green Sympathizers - not as zealous as the other two above, but they are environmentally aware, would like to do business with green companies and believe that green products and services will benefit their bottom-line. 

The Opportunity: These consumers make up 31% of the market.  They are technology geeks, and an ideal target for using energy efficient devices to go green.

Enviro-Friendly Skeptics - these consumers are a more cynical audience, at least in terms of receptivity to technology. This group does believe in adhering to a green lifestyle, but they are more negative about the potential impacts of technology.  In fact, they are the most likely to believe technology may worsen environmental problems.  As a result, they seek technologies with a proven track record.

The Opportunity: These consumers make up 12% of the market.  By focusing on the efficacy of the technology and programs you are using to implement your green strategies, you can gain the support of these customers.

Energy providers should take advantage of the recession to promote the green trends and reduce energy demand.  Energy utilities are perfectly positioned to lead the green movement.  Not only are they the focus of many environmental efforts, but they also have a huge impact on their surroundings.  They are tied hand-to-hand to the green movement.  The bottom line is that many consumers are waiting for their energy companies to lead the way in the green movement.  Through initiatives such as replacement programs, rebate programs and demand response programs, providers can meet their business needs of reducing energy consumption, save consumers money, AND help the environment.

February 11, 2010

Xcel Boosts Home Performance Rebates 30-50%

Filed under: New, Weatherizing and Retrofit — Tags: , , , — uswx @ 5:00 am

Xcel Energy trade relations manager Ann Kirkpatrick announced bonus Home Performance with Energy Star rebates Wednesday. The program rewards Xcel customers for making multiple energy conservation improvement to their homes. Minimum rebate for qualifying work is $445 and can easily reach nearly $1000 if measures included Energy Star washer and wall insulation. Not all homes qualify for Home Performance with Energy Star, however.

Energy efficiency programs have been suffering with high attrition rates for energy conservation measures recommended by energy audits. The  program requires a minimum of 5 improvements that include insulation, air sealing, high efficiency lighting and two other upgrades. Qualified projects completed and the final inspection made successfully by August 31, 2010

 Required Improvements Old Rebate Amount / New Rebate Amount  and % Increase

Attic Insulation & Bypass Sealing  $ 150.00 $ 225.00 50%
Air Sealing & Weather stripping  $ 100.00 $ 150.00 50%
High Efficiency Lighting $ 40.00 $ 40.00 0% no increase

Additional Improvements (two minimum)

Wall Insulation add R-11 or higher $ 250.00 $ 325.00 30%
New ENERGY STAR Set Back Thermostat $ 10.00 $ 15.00 50%
New 92% AFUE HE Furnace $ 80.00 $ 120.00 50%
New 94% AFUE HE Furnace $ 120.00 $ 160.00 33%
New 84% AFUE HE Boiler $ 120.00 $ 160.00 33%
New Electrically Efficient Furnace* $ 100.00 $ 130.00 30%
New Tankless Hot W/H .85 EF or higher $ 100.00 $ 130.00 30%
New Power Vented W/H. 65 EF or higher $ 60.00 $ 80.00 33%
New ENERGY STAR Refrigerator/Primary $ 10.00 $ 15.00 50%
ENERGY STAR Dishwasher $ 10.00 $ 15.00 50%
ENERGY STAR Clothes Washer $ 50.00 $ 70.00 40%

US Weatherizing specializes in complete delivery of Xcel’s  Home Performance with Energy Star. Our service starts with our exclusive energy audit and air sealing service that delivers energy efficiency, efficiently. Email us at info@usweatherizing.com to get your home qualified for this terrific program.

February 10, 2010

Best of Building Science Free Online Training

Filed under: Building Technology — Tags: , — uswx @ 5:00 am

Oklahoma Department of Commerce, State Energy Office “Best of Building Science” Online Training.
We hope that you find this online training resource valuable, and look forward to its continued development and improvement.
Featured here are lessons learned from the US-Department of Energy Building America program, delivered by some of the nation’s foremost building science professionals. They incorporate content from such sources as the Affordable Comfort conferences, “Home Energy” Magazine articles, and the DOE Building America partner technology reports. Presented in a video-based “in the field” format available 24/7 and specifically designed for builders, sub-contractors and design professionals in the residential construction business.

 

http://www.bestofbuildingscience.com

February 8, 2010

High Performance Building Case Studies

Filed under: Case Studies, New — Tags: , — uswx @ 5:00 am

Links below are studies that provide a summary of results for each of the homes built in partnership with Building Science Co’s Building America team. BSC prepares the case study after construction, testing and field monitoring are complete. The case study typically includes the project profile, enclosure details, mechanical design, and testing performed as well as the builder profile and unique project highlights.

CS-0003: House and Barn Renovation by Betsy Pettit - last modified 2009/04/06

CS-0004: House and Barn by Building Science Corporation - last modified 2009/08/25

CS-0006: Green Pastures by Building Science Corporation - last modified 2009/08/27

CS-0007: Meeder Residence by Building Science Corporation - last modified 2009/08/27

CS-0009: Snyder Residence by Building Science Corporation - last modified 2009/08/27

CS-0010: O’Leary Wei Residence by Building Science Corporation - last modified 2009/08/27

CS-0011: Gates Residence by Building Science Corporation - last modified 2009/08/27

CS-0016: Concord Four Square Retrofit by Betsy Pettit, FAIA - last modified 2009/07/22

CS-BA01: Suwanee River Administration Building by Building Science Corporation - last modified 2009/08/25

CS-BA02: EcoVillage Cleveland by Building Science Corporation - last modified 2009/04/15

CS-BA03: Copper Moon by Building Science Corporation - last modified 2009/08/27

CS-BA04: Fairburn by Building Science Corporation - last modified 2009/08/27

CS-BA05: Prairie Crossing by Building Science Corporation - last modified 2009/08/27

CS-BA06: 2008 Building America Prototype “ICI Showcase House” by Building Science Corporation - last modified 2009/02/17

CS-BA07: Project Home Again by Building Science Corporation - last modified 2009/02/17

CS-BA08: Coastal Habitats by A. Rudd/H. Feldman - last modified 2009/08/27

CS-BA09: GreenCraft Builders 2008 Greenspoint House Prototype by Building Science Corporation - last modified 2009/12/29

CS-BA10: David Weekley Homes’ Baxter Community: High Performance Green Building by Building Science Corporation - last modified 2009/03/03

CS-BA11: Eagle Springs and Waterhaven Communities by Building Science Corporation - last modified 2009/02/17

CS-BA12: Burlingame Ranch Phase I by Building Science Corporation - last modified 2009/03/19

CS-BA13: Westford Habitat House by Building Science Corporation - last modified 2009/08/27

CS-BA14: Hamilton Way Community Prototype by Building Science Corporation - last modified 2009/02/20

CS-BA015: Green Dream 1 by Building Science Corporation - last modified 2009/09/09

CS-BA016: Colleyville Eco House Prototype by Building Science Corporation - last modified 2009/06/16

CS-BA17: Cleveland Infill Prototype House by Building Science Corporation - last modified 2009/08/27

CS-BA18: Cleveland Prototype Housing by Building Science Corporation - last modified 2009/08/27

CS-BA19: Prairie Crossing Four Square by Building Science Corporation - last modified 2009/08/27

CS-BA21: The Anderson/Sargent Dallas Show House by Building Science Corporation - last modified 2009/08/27

February 4, 2010

Energy Conservation and Power Planning in the Northwest US

Filed under: Energy Policy — Tags: , , — uswx @ 5:00 am

It was salmon, not carbon that spurred energy conservation as a regional power planning tool in Washington, Oregon, Idaho and Montana. The region’s “green” hydropower system was threatening salmon and native tribes on the Columbia River, so the Northwest Power and Conservation Council was established in 1980 to balance power development with fish and wildlife interests.

Hydropower development in the northwest was established when congress directed the Bonneville Power Administration, in the Bonneville Project Act of 1937, to build and operate transmission lines to deliver the power from dams, and to market electricity from federal generating projects on the Columbia river system at rates set only high enough to repay the federal investment over a reasonable period of time.

Today, the Federal Columbia River Power system includes 31 dams with 20,444 megawatts of capacity. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers operates 21 of the dams, and the Bureau of Reclamation operates 10.

In 1976, Bonneville’s power demand and supply projections showed that federal power supplies were running short for preference customers, and that Bonneville would no longer be able to guarantee preference customers that their load growth could be met beyond 1983. Bonneville issued a notice of insufficiency to the utilities in June of 1976. The following month, 88 public utilities signed contracts with WPPSS to build nuclear plants 4and 5. The WPPSS nuclear construction program proved to be a debacle, but it also prompted changes in regional energy policy. Mismanagement and cost overruns at the five WPPSS plants were at the root of the financial problems, but the WPPSS debacle also was a failure of electricity demand forecasting. The impetus for the nuclear construction effort lay in demand forecasts produced by the region’s utilities, through the Pacific Northwest Utilities Conference Committee, and Bonneville. The forecasts proved to be too high.

By creating a regional planning council consisting of two members from each of the four Northwest states to develop a regional plan, Congress provided a regional decision-making system. It emphasizes local control of resource development and power planning.

The states of Idaho, Montana, Oregon, and Washington were authorized to form the Council (in the Act, Section 4.(a)(2)(A), it is called the Pacific Northwest Electric Power and Conservation Planning Council) with two representatives from each state, appointed by the governors. The Act directed the Council to draw up a plan for meeting the electrical needs of the region at the lowest possible cost. The plan must give highest priority to cost-effective conservation to meet future demand for electricity. Renewable sources of energy must be given next-highest priority in the region’s power planning, to the extent that they are cost-effective, ranking ahead of conventional thermal generating resources. Among thermal options, fuel-efficient methods of producing energy, such as cogeneration, must be given priority.

The current power plan comprises a resource development strategy to ensure the region’s future power supply is characterized by least-cost and least-risk resources. This plan recommends that the region increase and sustain its efforts to secure cost-effective conservation immediately. The Council’s analysis shows that improved energy efficiency is a resource that is lower cost than new generating options and provides a hedge against market, fuel, and environmental risks. Although conservation may result in small rate increases in the short-term, it can reduce both cost and risk in the long-term. The targets are ambitious but doable: 700 average megawatts between 2005 and 2009; and 2,500 average megawatts over the 20-year planning period.

Since the adoption of the Council’s first power plan in 1983 the region has made significant progress in acquiring conservation. The Council’s first power plan stated that the acquisition of cost-effective conservation should be used to reduce year 2002 loads by 5 to 17 percent depending upon the rate of economic growth experienced in the region. The plan called on Bonneville and region’s utilities to develop and implement a wide array of conservation programs. The plan also called on state and local governments to adopt more energy-efficient building codes. It called on the federal government to adopt national energy efficiency standards for appliances and to upgrade existing efficiency standards for new manufactured homes.

In response to the Council’s first power plan, the Bonneville Power Administration and the region’s utilities initiated conservation programs across all economic sectors. Between 1980 and 2002, it is estimated these programs acquired 1,425 average megawatts of electricity savings. Overall, the region’s conservation achievements have been impressive. Between 1980 and 2005, demand for power in the Northwest has been reduced by about 3,100 average megawatts through Bonneville programs, state energy codes, and federal standards. Converted to generation, that would be enough electricity for the entire state of Idaho plus western Montana.

Bonneville, the region’s utilities, and system benefits administrators have accelerated, or are accelerating, the pace of their conservation programs. Based on preliminary returns to the Regional Technical Forum’s (RTF) survey of regional conservation achievements in 2006, it appeared the Fifth Plan’s goal of 130 average megawatts for 2005 likely would be accomplished. From the survey returns received by the end of November 2006, the region acquired approximately 125 average megawatts of savings in 2005. The total Bonneville, utility, and system benefits charge administrator expenditures for conservation were just under $160 million, or about 1.7 percent of total retail revenues collected in 2005. The average utility cost of these savings was approximately $1.3 million per average megawatt.

This table summarizes the annual savings and expenditures for Bonneville, the Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance (Alliance),1 and the Energy Trust of Oregon2 and individual utilities that have responded to the RTF’s survey.

Table 1. Summary of Conservation Achievements (Preliminary)3 Program Administrator

2005

Projected 2006

Expenditures (million $)

Savings (MWa)

Expenditures (million $)

Savings (MWa)

Utility Conservation 96.2 72.4 112.5 61.8
Bonneville Conservation (ConAug) 15.2 13.1 15.0 15.6
Bonneville Conservation (C&RD) 20.7 9.4 12.0 6.9
Bonneville Low Income Weatherization 3.8 0.4 2.8 0.2
Utility Low-Income Weatherization 3.6 0.7 3.5 0.8
Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance 19.7 28.9 20.6 24.5
Total (Expenditures and MWa) 159.2 124.9 166.4 109.8
                   

Savings reported by the Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance decreased from 29 average megawatts in 2005 to 25 average megawatts in 2006. This reduction was due largely to changes in federal standards for residential clothes washers that were a target of one of the Alliance’s initial market transformation programs. The Alliance now is targeting even higher-efficiency machines beyond the federal standards.

February 2, 2010

Energy efficiency experiences, best practices and resources from program managers

Filed under: Case Studies — Tags: — uswx @ 5:00 am

Washington, D.C., February 2, 2010

New Interactive Web Resource Brings Added Energy Efficiency Program Support to Public Power Utilities at http://cleanefficientenergy.org

This new web resource, launched this week by the Clean and Efficient Energy Program (CEEP), encourages the sharing of experiences, best practices and educational resources among energy efficiency program managers at public power utilities. CEEP’s online community allows stakeholders to learn about and discuss aspects of energy efficiency program design, implementation and evaluation, while making connections with peers and energy efficiency experts.

CEEP, a nationwide initiative with a mission to promote and support the energy efficiency efforts of locally-owned utilities, is a partnership of the Alliance to Save Energy (the Alliance), the American Public Power Association (APPA), and the Large Public Power Council (LPPC).

Missy Mandell, LPPC’s Executive Director, points to the importance of energy efficiency as part of a utility’s resource plan stating “with demand outpacing supply, costs rising, and environmental concerns mounting, public power utilities face a number of challenges in securing affordable, reliable, and clean energy. Energy efficiency is one of the most constructive, cost-effective ways to address these challenges.”

The new web platform includes a comprehensive resource library where users can easily access decades’ worth of advice, how-to guidance and case studies, researched by and gathered from public and private sector leaders. Through ratings and comments, the user community can be actively involved in defining best practice strategies. CEEP frequently adds new materials to the site, however users are also encouraged to upload resources that they find helpful and to share information about their own successes and challenges.

In addition, users can seek or offer advice in CEEP’s discussion forums by joining an ongoing conversation or starting a new discussion thread. Overtime, CEEP will increasingly become a product of its users as it captures more and more information based on real world experiences.

APPA CEO & President Mark Crisson adds that “APPA seeks to offer a wide variety of education, policy and advocacy resources and services to help public power utilities promote energy efficiency. CEEP compliments Energy Efficiency Resource Central (www.eercnet.org), public power’s effort to provide resources on energy efficiency, by linking our members to guidance developed by dozens of energy efficiency advocacy organizations.”

Jan Schori, former general manager for the Sacramento Municipal Utility District, chairs the CEEP Steering Committee, which is comprised of fellow public power leaders. Schori comments, “There are 2,010 public power utilities in the U.S., accounting for 16 percent of all electricity sales. Many are leaders in energy efficiency - CEEP’s online community will help utilities that are just starting out or exploring new areas to find strategies that have already been field-tested and proven by their peers.”

The unveiling of cleanefficientenergy.org coincides with Clean Energy Week (February 1 - 5), an initiative of the Alliance to Save Energy and nearly 80 other organizations (www.cleanenergyweek.org). Alliance President Kateri Callahan notes, “The new CEEP website could not have come at a better time. This resource embodies many of the goals of our Clean Energy Week partners: to engender dialogue, to showcase proven best practices, and to advance energy efficiency.”

The Clean and Efficient Energy Program (CEEP) was initiated in 2009, as a joint-effort of the Alliance to Save Energy, American Pubic Power Association, and Large Public Power Council. CEEP is funded by support from the Sea Change Foundation and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

For further information, contact Emily Zimmerman 202-530-2246 or visit CEEP’s website (cleanefficientenergy.org); APPA’s Energy Efficiency Resource Central (www.eercnet.org) and Clean Energy Week’s information pages (www.cleanenergyweek.org).

January 25, 2010

Buyers Want Energy Efficiency and Comfort

Filed under: Case Studies — Tags: — uswx @ 5:00 am

Debbie Arrington

Jan 21, 2010 The Sacramento Bee

Jan. 20, 2010 (McClatchy-Tribune Regional News delivered by Newstex) — What do Americans want in their next home? Smaller, greener, family-friendly space.

That’s according to a new study released today (Wednesday) by Better Homes and Gardens.

At the International Builders Show in Las Vegas, BHG’s Eliot Nusbaum presented the results of the magazine’s “Next Home Survey.” The nationwide survey of more than 2,300 potential home buyers and current home owners found their top concerns include price, energy-efficiency, organization and comfort.

“Not surprisingly, we continue to see a ‘cents and sensibility’ approach when it comes to buying or improving a home, with practicality and price being top priorities,” Nusbaum said. “Today’s homeowner is also looking for a home that fits the entire family — from a multitasking home office, to expanding storage space needs, to a living room that can adapt to advancements in home entertainment and technology.”

Some highlights:

- Continuing the “downsizing” trend, more consumers (36 percent in 2009 compared to 32 percent in 2008) expect their next home to be “somewhat smaller” or “much smaller.” A greener home will be a priority, with 87 percent planning to have high-efficiency heating/cooling in their next home and 86 percent planning to have high-efficiency appliances.

- Almost half (48 percent) say green building practices and materials will be “more important” when purchasing their next home.

- The home office is a priority as 59 percent of consumers plan to have one in their next house. Of those, only 28 percent want a separate dedicated home office space (compared with 64 percent in 2008), with one-third now wanting a more multi-purposed space, such as combined office/computer/hobby/craft/art room.

A well-organized home is key, with 66 percent of respondents making “no-space-wasted” design a top priority. Also on the wish list is a separate laundry room (85 percent); an outdoor grilling and living area (68 percent); a kitchen with eating area (67 percent); and an extra bedroom with bath (65 percent).

Nearly two-thirds consider a comfortable family gathering space to be top priority in the next home. Instead of a kitchen-dining room combination, they’d rather have a family room partially separated from the kitchen (42 percent vs. 27 percent in 2008).

Three-quarters of respondents say the economy has had an impact on their home-improvement plans, with half having changed their home-improvement plans during the last year. Smaller projects prove to be the most popular, such as painting a room (54 percent), replacing/adding flooring or carpeting (38 percent), decorating/redecorating a room (35 percent) and landscaping the yard (30 percent).

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress